Today we take a peek into CTTW's post-witch-pre-professional-candidate-for-rent-money job, as head of her own "charity" promoting the many reasons to not have sex.
As well as opposing sex and condoms, CTTW's group made a big priority of preaching against masturbation. At the time of this posting there is no word on her position on the fact that fetuses have been filmed masturbating in the womb.
And while her strange nature-denying rhetoric seems amusing enough by itself, I am more interested in her deeply misogynistic view that the only purpose of a wife's existence is to provide her husband with orgasms, or that it is her job to relieve his sperm buildup whenever he needs it.
Look for the quote "If he already knows what pleases him and he can please himself then why am I in the picture?" at the very end of the montage.
Of course the smart aleck could respond "What do you know about it if you're such a super-virgin?" But for me, this is a virulently patriarchal and misogynist viewpoint rooted in a deep insecurity and a belief that a woman's only worth is in the sexual services she can provide to a man. For someone so obsessed with the idea that most sex is evil, she puts an inordinately high value on the role of sex in a woman's self worth.
Woe be it to any man who marries her, because his prostate is going to be in trouble if she's not constantly ready to service his urges. Perhaps all those decades of supposed "abstinence" has built up an incredible backlog of sexual desire and she's ever so ready to spend the rest of her life servicing her husbands every erection...
This brings up another CTTW contradiction. She says that she does not have sex, yet she says she dated witches (yes, I pluralized witches... no one seems to be noticing that the quote was "one of my first dates with a witch was on a satanic altar" suggesting she had other dates with these supposed "satanic" "witches")
Did she date witches or satanists or both or whatever it was platonically? That doesn't sound realistic. Is she a virgin of the born again variety only?
We are trying out the new youtube i-frame embedded player, let us know if you like it or prefer we stick with the old one. Theoretically this can allow you to watch on devices that do not play flash video (like iphones for instance)
No comments:
Post a Comment